Earlier this year, the European Commission proposed the Omnibus Package, a landmark initiative was designed to simplify key sustainability regulations, and reduce regulatory complexity for businesses advancing sustainability efforts, while still aligning with the EU’s ambitious climate goals. In the specific context of Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), it was proposed that the European Sustainability Reporting Standard (ESRS) be simplified to ease the compliance burden on reporting entities.
Following this, the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which originally developed the ESRS, received the mandate to evaluate and revise current standards through stakeholder engagement.
On June 20, 2025, EFRAG released its Draft Progress Report on the ESRS simplification exercise. The EFRAG Sustainability Reporting Board (SRB) approved the draft unanimously.
This report outlines major steps aimed at reducing the administrative burden on companies without compromising the CSRD’s core principles or the EU’s sustainability goals. In this blog, we explore the main challenges with the ESRS and how EFRAG intends to resolve them.
EFRAG’s revision efforts focus on reducing mandatory datapoints and prioritizing quantitative over narrative data. It also emphasizes the distinction between mandatory and voluntary disclosures. Moreover, the revisions seek to improve clarity, maintain consistency with EU laws, and enhance compatibility with global standards. All of this supports the materiality principle, ensuring companies only report relevant information.
To meet these goals, EFRAG has identified six key simplification levers.
EFRAG recognized that the Double Materiality Assessment (DMA), a core element of ESRS reporting, has been a major complexity for organizations.
To simplify the process, EFRAG proposes a top-down approach. This begins with the business model to identify material topics and reduces dependency on detailed impact, risk, and opportunity (IRO) assessments.
Stakeholder feedback indicated that the ESRS’s flexibility was not clearly communicated. As a result, companies struggle to tell their sustainability stories effectively. This weakens the utility of sustainability statements and conflicts with CSRD’s intent to give them equal weight as financial reports. To fix this, EFRAG introduces several flexibilities:
Minimum Disclosure Requirements (MDRs) in ESRS 2 outline cross-cutting disclosures on policies, actions, and targets (PATs) for material topics. Topical standards offer deeper PAT guidance. However, this layering has been seen as too detailed and duplicative, adding unnecessary complexity.
To resolve this, EFRAG proposes:
EFRAG identified several issues with ESRS language and structure. To increase transparency and ease of use, it will:
Beyond the main levers, EFRAG plans to address several technical concerns that also add to reporting burden:
EFRAG aims to align ESRS with ISSB Standards to minimize misinterpretations and differences by:
As EFRAG advances the revision process, stakeholders should track the following milestones:
EFRAG’s June 2025 Progress Report marks a pivotal shift toward a more practical and focused ESRS framework. By trimming mandatory datapoints, simplifying the DMA, and improving clarity, the revised standards aim to reduce compliance costs while enabling strategic ESG integration.
Especially in climate disclosures, where defensibility is vital, this new approach allows businesses to concentrate on material issues and actionable insights. As a result, companies can move beyond box-ticking exercises and adopt reporting practices that support long-term sustainability value.