Amended ESRS: Making Sense of Changes in the Environmental Standards

Table Of Contents

Background

In July 2025, EFRAG significantly amended the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) to make them simpler, more aligned with global frameworks, and easier to implement. The revisions include a 57% cut in mandatory datapoints and a 68% reduction overall, along with a restructured double materiality assessment that begins with the business model. All mandatory disclosures are now clearly marked, and optional guidance has been moved into a new Non-Mandatory Illustrative Guidance (NMIG) document. Relief mechanisms were also introduced to ease the reporting burden where necessary. 

Changes to the ESRS Structure

The ESRS structure has gone through considerable modification.In the revised structure, sub-sub-topics are now sub-topics and several of them are either amended or moved or merged or added or removed. Table 1 presents the key structural changes. 

SL NoTopicSub-Topic/Sub-sub Topic in the previous ESRSChanges
1Pollution (ESRS E2)Pollution of living organisms and food resourcesRemoved
2Substances of ConcernMerged into “Substances of concern, including substances of very high concern”
3Substances of High Concern
4Water (ESRS E3)N/ATopic renamed as “Water” from “Water and Marine Resources”
5Water discharges in the oceansRemoved
6Water StorageAdded
7Extraction and use of marine resourcesDeleted and moved to other standards: E1, E2, E4 and E5
8Biodiversity and ecosystems (ESRS E4)Drivers of biodiversity and ecosystem change (terrestrial and marine habitat change, invasive species)Amended. Sub-sub-topics are turned into a broader category of sub-topic
9State of speciesAmended. Renamed from “Impacts on the state of species” and examples are dropped
10The extent and condition of terrestrial and marine ecosystemsAmended. Renamed from Impacts on the extent and condition of ecosystems. Examples dropped. 
11Ecosystem servicesShortened from “Impacts and dependencies on ecosystem services”
12Circular economy and resource use (ESRS E5)N/ARenamed from “Circular Economy”
13Resources inflowsShortened from “Resources inflows, including resource use”
14Resource outflows related to products and servicesChanged from “Resource outflows related to products and materials”
15Resource outflows (waste)Renamed from “Waste”

E1 Climate Change 

Amendments have achieved a 53% reduction in datapoints and a 65% decrease in word count. Key changes include:

  • Transition Plan Disclosures (E1-1): Consolidated to emphasize high-level descriptions, clarifying that comprehensive management details are not required. A new datapoint on dependencies, including locked-in emissions, aligns with IFRS S2, while EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks were eliminated.
  • Climate-Related Risks (E1-2, E1-3): Revised for coherence, specifying key methodological elements without mandating scenario analysis. Enhanced alignment with IFRS S2.22 strengthens climate resilience disclosures.
  • Policies and Actions (E1-4, E1-5): Policy disclosures are streamlined, referencing general ESRS requirements. Action disclosures retain essential elements, such as decarbonization levers, but omit detailed financial linkages and EU Taxonomy references.
  • Targets (E1-6): Prioritize absolute GHG reduction targets aligned with a 1.5°C trajectory, eliminating baseline normalization and subsidiary-level requirements.
  • GHG Emissions (Scope 1, 2, 3) (E1-8): Aligned with the GHG Protocol, emphasizing financial control boundaries. Biogenic emissions are now in the main disclosure, with flexibility on GWP values. Total GHG emissions and intensity metrics were removed.

E2 Pollution

Amendments have achieved a 61% reduction in datapoints and a 68% decrease in word count. Key changes include:

  • Material IROs (E2): Eliminated entirely, with content integrated into ESRS 2 General Disclosures, removing redundancies and the LEAP approach guidance.
  • Policies (E2-1) and Actions (E2-2): Streamlined to reference ESRS 2 General Disclosures, deleting pollution-specific requirements and mitigation hierarchy details, now in non-mandatory illustrative guidance (NMIG).
  • Targets (E2-3): Reduced to reference ESRS 2, with ecological threshold requirements simplified and moved to NMIG, reflecting methodological immaturity.
  • Pollution of Air, Water, and Soil (E2-4): Simplified to focus on material emissions, with microplastics disclosure enhanced by including secondary microplastics and aligning with REACH Regulation. 
  • Substances of Concern (E2-5): Clarified requirements, distinguishing manufacturers/importers from users, who focus on substances of very high concern, aligned with REACH thresholds.
  • Anticipated Financial Effects (E2-6): Removed due to immature methodology, centralized in ESRS 2.

E3 Water

The amended ESRS E3 is significantly lighter with datapoints by 70% and word count by 82%.

  • Scope Adjustment: The term “marine resources” removed from the standard’s title; related disclosures shifted to E5 (Resource Use) and E4 (Biodiversity).
  • Material IROs (E3-IRO-1): Eliminated, with content integrated into ESRS 2 General Disclosures, removing LEAP approach guidance.
  • Policies (E3-1): Simplified to reference ESRS 2 GDR-P, retaining core disclosure on water-related impact management. Sustainable oceans and related ARs moved to non-mandatory illustrative guidance (NMIG).
  • Actions (E3-2): Consolidated to focus on key actions and resources, referencing ESRS 2 GDR-A. Mitigation hierarchy details relocated to NMIG.
  • Targets (E3-3): Streamlined to align with ESRS 2 GDR-T, with ecological threshold guidance moved to NMIG.
  • Water Metrics (E3-4): Maintains mandatory disclosures on water consumption, recycling, storage, and adds water withdrawal and discharge as mandatory, reflecting stakeholder emphasis on water balance. Water intensity removed; geographical disaggregation retained.
  • Financial Effects (E3-5): Deleted due to immature methodology, centralized in ESRS 2.

E4 Biodiversity and Ecosystems

Amendments have reduced both datapoints and word count by 78%, streamlining disclosures, enhancing clarity, and aligning with EU environmental objectives. Here are the highlights::

  • Transition Plan (E4-1): Focuses solely on biodiversity transition plans, made mandatory but conditional on plan existence and prior public disclosure. Strategy resilience provisions moved to ESRS 2 SBM-3.
  • Material IROs (E4-IRO-1): Removed, with content consolidated into ESRS 2, eliminating LEAP approach guidance and scenario analysis specifications, now in non-mandatory illustrative guidance (NMIG).
  • Policies (E4-2): Streamlined to reference ESRS 2 GDR-P, retaining specifications on traceability and sites near biodiversity-sensitive areas (BSAs). Other details moved to NMIG.
  • Actions (E4-3): Simplified to reference ESRS 2 GDR-A, focusing on biodiversity offsets. Mitigation hierarchy guidance relocated to NMIG.
  • Targets (E4-4): Aligned with ESRS 2 GDR-T, retaining biodiversity offset specification. Ecological threshold requirements are simplified and moved to ESRS 2.
  • Metrics (E4-5): Consolidated site-specific provisions, using “location” for flexibility. Material metrics disclosure retained, with detailed indicators moved to NMIG.
  • Financial Effects (E4-6): Deleted due to methodological immaturity, centralized in ESRS 2.

E5 Circular Economy

EFRAG has achieved a 60% reduction in datapoints and a 72% decrease in word count. Key changes include:

  • Scope Clarification: Marine resources explicitly included as resource inflows, aligning with E3 and E4. Terminology updated from “products and materials” to “products and services” for broader applicability.
  • Material IROs: Removed, integrated into ESRS 2 General Disclosures, with affected communities addressed under ESRS 1 for cross-sector relevance.
  • Policies, Actions, Targets (E5-1, E5-2, E5-3): Streamlined to reference ESRS 2 GDR-P, GDR-A, and GDR-T, with circularity and eco-design principles added for policies, aligned with EU regulations. Other elements moved to non-mandatory illustrative guidance (NMIG).
  • Resource Inflows (E5-4): Simplified to focus on key materials, with new datapoint on critical and strategic raw materials. Technical and biological material disclosures moved to application requirements (ARs).
  • Resource Outflows (E5-5): Consolidated to cover products, services, and waste. Durability and repairability shifted to narrative disclosure; new datapoint on recycled materials in key products.
  • Financial Effects (E5-6): Deleted due to methodological immaturity, centralized in ESRS 2.

These changes are currently open for public consultation until 29 September 2025, with final technical advice expected to be submitted to the European Commission by 31 October 2025. The release of amended ESRS marks a significant step in streamlining non-sustainability disclosures in the EU. As we wait for the Omnibus proposal to get finalized, companies expected to be in-scope need to assess the changes and refine their reporting strategy. 

Abbreviations

  • AR: Application Requirement
  • BSA: Biodiversity-Sensitive Areas
  • DNSH: Do No Significant Harm
  • EFRAG: European Financial Reporting Advisory Group
  • E-PRTR: European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register
  • ESRS: European Sustainability Reporting Standards
  • GDR-A: General Disclosures – Actions (referenced in ESRS 2)
  • GDR-P: General Disclosures – Policies (referenced in ESRS 2)
  • GDR-T: General Disclosures – Targets (referenced in ESRS 2)
  • GHG: Greenhouse Gas
  • IFRS: International Financial Reporting Standards
  • IRO: Impacts, Risks, and Opportunities
  • LEAP: Locate, Evaluate, Assess, and Prepare (an approach for materiality assessment)
  • NMIG: Non-Mandatory Illustrative Guidance
  • PATs: Policies, Actions, and Targets
  • REACH: Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (Regulation)
  • SBM: Strategy and Business Model (referenced in ESRS 2, e.g., SBM-3)
  • SFDR: Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation

FAQs

What are the July 2025 amendments to the ESRS environmental standards?

The amendments significantly simplify the ESRS, cutting mandatory datapoints by 57% and total datapoints by 68%. They restructure environmental standards (E1–E5), streamline disclosures, align with global frameworks like IFRS S2, and introduce relief mechanisms to reduce reporting burden.

What is NMIG and how does it affect reporting?

NMIG stands for Non-Mandatory Illustrative Guidance. It replaces optional “may disclose” content in the ESRS with non-binding examples and methodologies. NMIG helps companies interpret and implement the standards without adding new compliance requirements.

How was ESRS E1 (Climate Change) simplified?

ESRS E1 saw a 53% reduction in datapoints. Key changes include streamlined transition plan disclosures, removal of scenario analysis requirements, emphasis on high-level GHG targets aligned with 1.5°C, and greater alignment with GHG Protocol boundaries. Total GHG and intensity disclosures were dropped.

What are the major changes in ESRS E2 (Pollution)?

ESRS E2 was reduced by 61% in datapoints and 68% in word count. Material IROs were eliminated, targets and policies were consolidated into ESRS 2 references, and microplastics disclosure was expanded. Methodologies lacking maturity were removed or moved to NMIG.

Why was “marine resources” removed from ESRS E3 (Water)?

The term “marine resources” was removed to simplify the scope. Related disclosures were redistributed to ESRS E4 (Biodiversity) and ESRS E5 (Circular Economy). This improves clarity and ensures marine-related topics are covered where most relevant.

How is water use now reported under ESRS E3?

Companies must now disclose water consumption, recycling, storage, withdrawals, and discharges. Water intensity metrics were removed. Disclosures are more focused, and geographical disaggregation remains mandatory for context.

What changed in ESRS E4 (Biodiversity and Ecosystems)?

ESRS E4 saw a 78% reduction in datapoints. The biodiversity transition plan is now mandatory if publicly disclosed. Material IROs were removed, and detailed scenario analysis moved to NMIG. Metrics were consolidated using more flexible location-based disclosures.

What’s new in ESRS E5 (Circular Economy)?

The standard was renamed from “Circular Economy” to “Circular Economy and Resource Use.” Disclosure on critical raw materials was added. Waste, durability, and repairability were reorganized. Financial impact disclosures were removed and centralized in ESRS 2.

Were any environmental sub-topics removed or merged?

Yes. Several sub-sub-topics were removed (e.g. “pollution of living organisms”), merged (e.g. “substances of concern” and “very high concern”), or renamed. Marine-related disclosures were redistributed. The taxonomy was flattened for clarity and consistency.

What should companies do in response to these changes?

Companies should review the amended standards, compare them against their current reporting frameworks, and adjust their sustainability data systems. They should also participate in the public consultation (until September 29, 2025) to shape the final rules expected by October 31.

© 2025 Sprih. All rights reserved.